History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Spintz
18 F. 377
U.S. Circuit Court for the Sou...
1883
Check Treatment

The defendant demurred to the indictment for misjoinder. The court overruled the demurrer, as stated in head-note 1. See U. S. v. Wentworth, 11 Fed. Rep. 52; U. S. v. Malone, 9 Fed. Rep. 900; U. S. v. Stone, 8 Fed. Rep. 252; U. S. v. Ancarola, 1 Fed. Rep. 677.

Defendant pleaded misnomer; that he was indicted as Joseph Spintz, and that his true name is Joseph Sprinz; and that he was known only by his true name. The district attorney demurred to the plea, hut the demurrer was overruled, as stated in head-note 2. See Arelib. Grim. PI. & Pr. 82; Lynes v. State, 30 Amer. Dec. 557; 39 Amer. Dec. 457; 28 Amer. Rep. 439, note.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Spintz
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 15, 1883
Citation: 18 F. 377
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.