History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Spies
128 F.2d 743
2d Cir.
1942
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The only question upon this appeal of enough importance to demand notice is the judge’s charge, which followed the interpretation put upon § 145(b), 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev. Code, in O’Brien v. United States, 7 Cir., 51 F.2d 193, which we followed in United States v. Miro, 60 F.2d 58. We all agree that we must continue so to construe the section until the Supreme Court decides otherwise; but Judge L. HAND wishes it to appear that as a new matter he would decide otherwise, and would reverse this conviction in accordance with the reasoning of Judge Alschuler’s dissent in O’Brien v. United States, supra, which appears to him unanswerable.

Conviction affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Spies
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: Jun 19, 1942
Citation: 128 F.2d 743
Docket Number: No. 280
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.