Case Information
*1 This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GROSS, GERRITY, and de GROOT Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v.
Kodi G. SIMON Staff Sergeant (E-6), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 202400241 _________________________ Decided: 16 May 2025 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Adam K. Workman Sentence adjudged 23 February 2024 by a special court-martial con- vened at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-3, con- finement for twelve months, and a bad-conduct discharge.
Opinion of the Court For Appellant: Lieutenant Benjamin M. Cook, JAGC, USN
_________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellantโs substantial rights occurred. [1]
However, we note that the Entry of Judgment does not correctly reflect the convening authorityโs 25 April 2024 clemency action to suspend confinement in excess of nine months for a period of six months pursuant to the recommen- dation of the military judge. Although we find no prejudice, Appellant is enti- tled to have court-martial records that correctly reflect the content of his pro- ceeding. [2] In accordance with Rule for Courts-Martial 1111(c)(2), we modify the Entry of Judgment and direct that it be included in the record.
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED .
FOR THE COURT: MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court *3 UNITED STATES NMCCA NO. 202400241 v. ENTRY
OF JUDGMENT Kodi G. SIMON Staff Sergeant (E-6)
U.S. Marine Corps As Modified on Appeal
Accused
16 May 2025 On 23 February 2024, the Accused was tried at Naval Station Norfolk, Vir- ginia, by a special court-martial, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Military Judge Adam K. Workman presided.
FINDINGS The following are the Accusedโs pleas and the Courtโs findings to all of- fenses the convening authority referred to trial:
Charge I: Violation of Article 119b, Uniform Code of Military
Justice, 10 U.S.C. ยง 919b.
Plea: Guilty.
Finding: Guilty. Specification: Child Endangerment by Culpable
Negligence Resulting in Grievous Bodily Harm on or about 27 November 2022. Plea: Guilty.
Finding: Guilty. Modified Entry of Judgment Charge II: Violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice,
10 U.S.C. ยง 934.
Plea: Not Guilty.
Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed without prejudice to ripen into prejudice upon completion of appellate review.
Specification: Negligent Homicide on or about 27
November 2022.
Plea: Not Guilty.
Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed without prejudice to ripen into prejudice upon completion of appellate review.
Additional Charge: Violation of Article 119, Uniform Code of
Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. ยง 919. Plea: Not Guilty.
Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed without prejudice to ripen into prejudice upon completion of appellate review.
Specification: Involuntary Manslaughter of a Child Under
the Age of 16 on or About 27 November 2022. Plea: Not Guilty Finding: Withdrawn and dismissed without prejudice to ripen into prejudice upon completion of appellate review. SENTENCE On 23 February 2024, a military judge sentenced Staff Sergeant Simon to the following:
Reduction to pay grade E-3.
Confinement for a total of 12 months.
A bad-conduct discharge. On 25 April 2024, pursuant to the plea agreement, the convening authority approved Staff Sergeant Simonโs request to defer and waive automatic forfei- tures pursuant to Articles 57 and 58b, UCMJ. The period of the deferment will run from the date on which automatic forfeiture of pay and allowances become effective until Entry of Judgment, and the period of waiver will run for six (6) months from the date of the Entry of Judgment.
Modified Entry of Judgment In accordance with Rule for Courts-Martial 1110, pursuant to the recom- mendation of the military judge, the convening authority suspended all con- finement in excess of nine (9) months for a period of six (6) months. The convening authority took no further action on the sentence.
FOR THE COURT: MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court
[1] Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. ยงยง 859, 866.
[2] United States v. Crumpley , 49 M.J. 538, 539 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 1998).
