History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Sharu Bey
16-7008
| 4th Cir. | Nov 22, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sharu Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Steven R. Kaufman, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Sharu Bey appeals the district court’s text order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bey, No. 3:07-cr-00079-FDW-2 (W.D.N.C. July 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Sharu Bey
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 22, 2016
Docket Number: 16-7008
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.