History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Sean Robinson
16-6702
| 4th Cir. | Oct 20, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sean Anthony Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill, Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Heather L. Hart, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Sean Anthony Robinson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the district court’s prior orders denying, and later granting, a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). Because the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider Robinson’s motion for reconsideration, we affirm the denial of relief. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding district court lacks authority to grant motion to reconsider ruling on § 3582(c)(2) motion). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Sean Robinson
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 20, 2016
Docket Number: 16-6702
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.