History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis
483 F.3d 381
5th Cir.
2006
Check Treatment
Docket

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Everardo ROSENBAUM-ALANIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41400

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

April 11, 2006

448

Conference Calendar.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Michael L. Herman, Sarah Beth Landau, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Everardo Rosenbaum-Alanis (Rosenbaum) pleaded guilty and was convicted of illegal reentry after deportation. He was sentenced to 18 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release.

Rosenbaum contends that the district court erred by characterizing his state felony conviction for possession of a controlled substance as an “aggravated felony” for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2. Relief on this issue is precluded. See

United States v. Rivera, 265 F.3d 310, 312-13 (5th Cir.2001);
United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez, 130 F.3d 691, 693-94 (5th Cir.1997)
. Rosenbaum argues that this circuit‘s precedent is inconsistent with
Jerome v. United States, 318 U.S. 101, 63 S.Ct. 483, 87 L.Ed. 640 (1943)
. Having preceded
Hinojosa-Lopez
,
Jerome
is not “an intervening Supreme Court case explicitly or implicitly overruling that prior precedent.” See
United States v. Short, 181 F.3d 620, 624 (5th Cir.1999)
.

Rosenbaum also asserts that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. Rosenbaum‘s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Rosenbaum contends that
Almendarez-Torres
was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule
Almendarez-Torres
in light of
Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000)
, we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that
Almendarez-Torres
remains binding. See
United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.)
, cert. denied,
U.S., 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005)
. Rosenbaum properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of
Almendarez-Torres
and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Notes

*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 11, 2006
Citation: 483 F.3d 381
Docket Number: 05-41400
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.