76-3446 | 9th Cir. | Nov 26, 1979
609 F.2d 433" court="9th Cir." date_filed="1979-11-26" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/united-states-v-ronald-santora-earl-rardin-maurice-eugene-lickteig-theresa-sohn-garth-jon-brian-upton-roy-cohn-mary-evans-and-walter-p-moore-371447?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="371447">609 F.2d 433
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ronald SANTORA, Earl Rardin, Maurice Eugene Lickteig,
Theresa Sohn, Garth Jon Brian Upton, Roy Cohn,
Mary Evans, and Walter P. Moore,
Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 76-3440, 76-3446, 76-3485, 76-3521, 76-3525, 76-3567,
76-3711 and 77-2626.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 26, 1979.
ORDER
Before HUFSTEDLER and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and KING,* district judge.
The opinion heretofore filed, 9 Cir., 600 F.2d 1317" court="9th Cir." date_filed="1979-07-18" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/united-states-v-ronald-santora-earl-rardin-maurice-eugene-lickteig-theresa-sohn-garth-jon-brian-upton-roy-cohn-mary-evans-and-walter-p-moore-367219?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="367219">600 F.2d 1317, is amended by deleting the following language at page 2573, at the end of the first full paragraph in the right-hand column of the printed slip opinion (600 F.2d 1317" court="9th Cir." date_filed="1979-07-18" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/united-states-v-ronald-santora-earl-rardin-maurice-eugene-lickteig-theresa-sohn-garth-jon-brian-upton-roy-cohn-mary-evans-and-walter-p-moore-367219?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="367219">600 F.2d at 1322.):
"Since Cohn's conversations must be suppressed, his conviction must be reversed for insufficient evidence. Because Cohn cannot be retried (Greene v. Massey (1978) 437 U.S. 19" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1978-06-14" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/greene-v-massey-109892?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="109892">437 U.S. 19, 98 S. Ct. 2151, 57 L. Ed. 2d 15), we need not reach the question whether his right to a speedy trial was violated."
Footnote 2 is inserted following the words "traffic with Paul Harmon" in the same paragraph.
The text of footnote 2 shall read as follows:
"We have examined Cohn's speedy trial claim and are satisfied it does not meet the four-part test laid down by the Supreme Court in Barker v. Wingo (1972) 407 U.S. 514" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1972-06-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/barker-v-wingo-108590?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="108590">407 U.S. 514, 530-33, 92 S. Ct. 2182, 33 L. Ed. 2d 101."
The Government's petition for rehearing is denied.
Honorable Samuel P. King, Chief Judge, United States District Court, District of Hawaii, sitting by designation