United States v. Ronald Mitchell, United States of America v. Ronald Mitchell
136 F.3d 1192
8th Cir.1998Check Treatment*3 ture BEAM, Circuit Judge, concurring part technically ad dissenting in part. promise hered its to make a 5K1.1 mo I opinion with the regarding concur court’s Nevertheless, tion. I dissent from the AUSA’s reference to Mitchell’s “reward” in for resentencing. court’s order I remand ease, post-office robbery subse affirm on all issues. quent victim-impact introduction of statements, spirit promise violated the of the ultimately agreement. Clark, (1st
Cir.1995) (concluding government’s submis-