*1 Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: [*]
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Rolando Rodriguez-Bautista raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt , 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of a 21 U.S.C. § 841 offense. Nor is knowledge of drug type and quantity an element of an offense under either 21 U.S.C. § 952(a) or 21 U.S.C. § 960(a). See United States v. Valencia-Gonzales , 172 F.3d 344, *2 Case: 16-40335 Document: 00513882817 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
No. 16-40335
345-46 (5th Cir. 1999); United States v. Restrepo-Granda , 575 F.2d 524, 527 (5th Cir. 1978). Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2
[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.