delivered the opinion of the court, reversing the decision of the cir-. cult court and remanding the ease for a new trial.
The assessment of the commissioner of internal revenue was only prima facie evidence of the amount due as taxes upon the spirits distilled between the dates mentioned. It established a prima facie case of liability, and if not-impeached it was sufficient to justify a recovery; but every material fact, upon which his liability was asserted was open to contestation. The distiller and his sureties were at liberty to show that no spirits, or a less quantity than
