History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Richard Bernard
693 F. App'x 223
4th Cir.
2017
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Dwight Bernard, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia L. Norman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Dwight Bernard appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bernard , No. 3:03-cr-00420-JRS-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 30, 2017). We deny Bernard’s motion for an enlargement of time to appeal as moot and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Richard Bernard
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 21, 2017
Citation: 693 F. App'x 223
Docket Number: 17-6225
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.