History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Reginald Falice
704 F. App'x 256
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Anthony Falice, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Felice appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion to dismiss his federal criminal conviction for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. Falice , No. 3:98-cr-00244-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. June 20, 2017).

We deny Falice’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Reginald Falice
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 27, 2017
Citation: 704 F. App'x 256
Docket Number: 17-6856
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.