History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Rapapport
157 F.3d 900
5th Cir.
1998
Check Treatment

*1 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: [*]

Court-appointed counsel for Michael Rapapport has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , [1] and moved to withdraw. Rapapport sought leave to proceed pro se . Counsel’s motion was granted, excusing him from further responsibilities herein, and Rapapport was given 30 days in which to file a brief, should he opt to do so, raising any matter he deemed relevant to his appeal. The *2 time allowed has expired and no such filing has been made.

Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue which may be presented herein. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.

2

Notes

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

[1] 336 U.S. 738 (1967).

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Rapapport
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 20, 1998
Citation: 157 F.3d 900
Docket Number: 97-10162
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In