*1 Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Randy Arlan Mainwaring appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 28-month sentence imposed upon his third revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Mainwaring contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The *2 district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Mainwaring’s sentence. See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The above-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Mainwaring’s repeated breaches of the court’s trust and his unsuitability for supervised release. See Gall , 552 U.S. at 51; United States v. Simtob , 485 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir. 2007).
AFFIRMED.
2 16-30084
[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).