*1 Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: [*]
The attorney appointed to represent Ramiro Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Hernandez’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without *2 Case: 16-60635 Document: 00514013039 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/31/2017
No. 16-60635
prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Hernandez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
2
[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.