History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Rafael Hernandez-Rodriguez
688 F. App'x 193
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rafael Hernandez-Rodriguez, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rafael Hernandez-Rodriguez appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). On appeal, he challenges the extent of the district court’s reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. The district court reduced his sentence to the bottom of his amended Guidelines range based on Amendment 782. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Hernandez-Rodriguez , No. 1:11-cr- 00309-WO-5 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Rafael Hernandez-Rodriguez
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 3, 2017
Citation: 688 F. App'x 193
Docket Number: 16-7714
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.