16276 | 5th Cir. | Dec 26, 1956

239 F.2d 384" date_filed="1956-12-26" court="5th Cir." case_name="United States v. R. F. Ball Construction Company, Inc., and United Pacific Insurance Company">239 F.2d 384

57-1 USTC P 9269

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
R. F. BALL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Inc., and United Pacific
Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 16276.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 26, 1956.

A. F. Prescott, George F. Lynch, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., Russell B. Wine, U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex.

Elmer J. Kelsey, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., John N. Stull, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Harman Parrott, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for appellant.

Richard U. Simon, Ft. Worth, Tex., Josh H. Groce, San Antonio, Tex., Eskridge, Groce & Hebdon, San Antonio, Tex., of counsel, for appellee.

Before CAMERON, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The facts of this case are well recited and the controlling principles of law are well stated in the opinion of Judge Rice, R. F. Ball Construction Company v. Jacobs, D.C., 140 F. Supp. 60" date_filed="1956-03-29" court="W.D. Tex." case_name="RF Ball Construction Company v. Jacobs">140 F. Supp. 60. For the reasons there set forth the judgment appealed from is

2

Affirmed.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.