History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Plyler
222 U.S. 15
SCOTUS
1911
Check Treatment

Memorandum opinion by direction of the court.

By Mr. Justice Holmes.

This is an indictment for forging vouchers required upon examination by the Civil Service Commission of the United States, certifying to the character., physical capacity, etc., of the applicant, the defendant, and for presenting the same to the Commission. The District Court held that the acts were not frauds against the United States within the Contemplation of R. S., § 5418, and dis *17 charged the défendant. The Government excepted and brought the case to this'court. It now must be regarded as established that “it is not essential to charge or prove an. actual financial or property loss to make a case under the statute.” The section covers this case. Haas v. Henkel, 216 U. S. 462, 480; Curley v. United States, 130 Fed. Rep. 1; United States v. Bunting, 82 Fed. Rep. 883.

Judgment reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Plyler
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 30, 1911
Citation: 222 U.S. 15
Docket Number: 440
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.