History
  • No items yet
midpage
24-50293
5th Cir.
Apr 14, 2025

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HECTOR MANUEL NUNEZ-CARDENAS

No. 24-50293

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

April 14, 2025

Summary Calendar

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:22-CR-206-1

Before WIENER, HO, and RAMIREZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Hector Manuel Nunez-Cardenas appeals following his conviction for illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, arguing for the first time on appeal that the statutory sentencing enhancement in § 1326(b) is unconstitutional. He concedes this argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), and

the Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance or, alternatively, for an extension of time in which to file a brief.

The argument is foreclosed. See United States v. Pervis, 937 F.3d 546, 553-54 (5th Cir. 2019); see also Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821, 838 (2024) (explaining that Almendarez-Torres “persists as a narrow exception permitting judges to find only the fact of a prior conviction” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)). Therefore, summary affirmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension of time is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Notes

*
This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Nunez-Cardenas
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 14, 2025
Citation: 24-50293
Docket Number: 24-50293
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In