United States v. Noushfar, Nos. 94-30229, 94-30350 and 94-30353

Nos. 94-30229, 94-30350 and 94-30353 | 9th Cir. | Apr 1, 1998

ORDER

The Opinion filed on March 20, 1996, 78 F.3d 1442" court="9th Cir." date_filed="1996-03-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/united-states-of-america-plaintiff-appellee-v-massoud-noushfar-zohreh-shayesteh-and-kamran-shayesteh-defendants-appellants-714869?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="714869">78 F.3d 1442 (9th Cir.1996), is amended as follows:

The first sentence of the final paragraph on page 1445 of the opinion as published, beginning with “In Riley v. Deeds. ...,” is replaced to read:

In Riley v. Deeds, 56 F.3d 1117" court="9th Cir." date_filed="1995-06-06" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/raymond-f-riley-v-george-deeds-697355?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="697355">56 F.3d 1117, 1121 (9th Cir.1995), we found structural error when testimony was reread in court without the judge present and with his clerk “presiding.”