*1 Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Nazario Marquez-Flores appeals the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the consecutive 18-month sentence *2 imposed upon revocation of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Marquez-Flores’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Marquez-Flores the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief in these direct appeals.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2 16-10284 & 16-10298
[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).