History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Mustafa Muhammad
17-7258
| 4th Cir. | Dec 28, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*2 Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mustafa Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Heather Hart Mansfield, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In No. 17-7258, Mustafa Muhammad appeals the denial of his motion for recusal, and in No. 17-7430, he appeals the denial of his Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion for new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Muhammad , No. 3:14-cr-00055- REP-DJN-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 12, 2017; Oct. 11, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Mustafa Muhammad
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 28, 2017
Docket Number: 17-7258
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.