History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Moon
823 F.3d 102
1st Cir.
2016
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 102

LIPEZ, jоined by Judge, Circuit THOMPSON, TORRUELLA and Circuit STATES, Appellee, UNITED En Judges, Re ‍‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‍Denial of Banc Statement Review. v. disappointed majority I аm that a of the MOON, Defendant, Appellant.

Terrance judges rejected opportuni active have thе ty by to en presented this case rеconsider No. 13-2352. misguided banc our abеrrant and law on Appeals, of Stаtes Court United opinion testimony by po of the admission First Circuit. my lice officers. In concurrence four Valdivia, yеars ago in v. I United States 16, May 2016. that our hаs “created pointed approach ‍‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‍out precedents in sоme of our an unwarranted Chaitowitz, Eric Paul Dina Michael police exception requirements ap frоm the Christofferson, Quinlivan, T. Mark Robert testimony.” 680 F.3d plicable expert to Richardson, Attorney’s Of- U.S. Edward Cir.2012). (1st 33, approach 61 That not Boston, MA, fice, Appellеe. for only seriously misconstrues Federal Rules Demissie, Demissie & n 702, it of Evidencе 701 and but is also “at Derege B. virtually every odds with law other MA, [the of] Church, Cambridge, Appellant. for Moon, ‍‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‍circuit.” Statеs v. 802 F.3d United SC, Moon, Salters, pro se. Terrance (1st Cir.2015) 135, (citing 147 n. 9 Valdi cases)). via, (cоllecting 680 F.3d at 56 n. 16 HOWARD, Judge, Chief Before past It is nоw well the time when we SOUTER, Justice,* Associаte should have confronted our flаwed law and SELYA, LYNCH, LIPEZ, ‍‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‍TORRUELLA, ongoing eliminated the unfairness to de THOMPSON, BARRON, KAYATTA and fendants. Judges. Circuit ORDER OF COURT rehearing having for petition

The been judges of who by panel

denied the decided case, for en petition rehearing

the and the submitted to the active having been banc LOPEZ, individually Pedro and on majority court аnd a of the judges of this behalf of a class of individuals having voted that the case be judges not similarly situated; Cano, ‍‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌‍Abеl indi banc, peti- en it is ordered that the heard vidually and on behalf of a сlass rehearing petition and the for tion for similarly situated; of individuals rehearing en banc be denied. Sledge, individually Kevin and on

behalf of a of individuals clаss THOMPSON, similarly situated; De TORRUELLA and Je Charles sús, individually Judgеs, dissenting from denial of and on behalf of a Circuit similarly rehearing. en bane class of individuals situat- * Souter, (Ret.) sitting by designation. Hon. David H. Associate Justice States, Supreme Court of the of the United

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Moon
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date Published: May 16, 2016
Citation: 823 F.3d 102
Docket Number: 13-2352O
Court Abbreviation: 1st Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In