History
  • No items yet
midpage
121 F.3d 705
5th Cir.
1997

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, versus GARY WAYNE MINTER,

Nos. 95-11099 & 96-10217

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

July 18, 1997

Summary Calendar

Plaintiff-Appellee, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CV-499-A

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gary Wayne Minter appeals from the district court‘s denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and from the district court‘s partial grant of his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582. He argues that the district court abused its discretion with regard to the extent of the reduction it ordered to his sentence, that he was denied his statutory right to notice of a possible sentence enhancement, that the district court erred in its application of the sentencing guidelines, that his sentence was calculated in violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause, and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to object to these issues or to raise them on direct appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. To the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, it is DENIED.

Notes

*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Minter
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 24, 1997
Citations: 121 F.3d 705; 95-11099
Docket Number: 95-11099
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    United States v. Minter, 121 F.3d 705