*1 Before BENTON, KELLY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Michael Lee Bevins appeals after the district court [1] revoked his term of supervised release. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms. *2 On appeal, Bevins argues the district court erred in finding that a preponderance of the evidence showed he violated his conditions of supervision. This court finds no basis for reversal. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (court may revoke supervised release if it finds by preponderance of evidence that defendant violated conditions of supervised release); United States v. Miller , 557 F.3d 910, 913-14 (8th Cir. 2009) (this court reviews decision to revoke supervised release for abuse of discretion, and underlying factual findings as to whether a violation occurred for clear error; district court need find only one violation to revoke supervised release); United States v. Black Bear , 542 F.3d 249, 252 (8th Cir. 2008) (under clear error review, this court may reverse only if it has a definite and firm conviction that district court was mistaken); cf. United States v. Asalati , 615 F.3d 1001, 1005 (8th Cir. 2010) (witness credibility determinations, reviewed for clear error, are “virtually unreviewable” on appeal).
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
______________________________
-2-
[1] The Honorable C.J. Williams, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.