United States v. Maxwell

Case Information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

United States of America, $-v-$ Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant.

| USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC#: $$
DATE FILED: $2/4/22$ | | :--: | | | | | | |

20-CR-330 (AJN) ORDER

ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: As a post-trial house-keeping matter, attached to this Order are the Court Exhibits. The parties have proposed redactions to several exhibits and the sealing of Court Exhibit 4. The Court concludes that the proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006), and narrowly tailored. The redactions serve the purpose of protecting the anonymity of jurors and of victim-witnesses subject to the Court's anonymity order. With respect to Court Exhibit 4, rather than seal the entire document, the Court has redacted the information that would potentially identify the victim-witness who testified pursuant to the Court's anonymity order. Unredacted copies of the Court Exhibits will be filed under seal.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 4, 2022 New York, New York

ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge

20cr330, U.S. v. Maxwell Jurcrs to Proceed to Voir Dire 1. 2 2. 7 3. 8 4. 12 5. 13 6. 14 7. 20 8. 21 9. 22 10. 26 11. 27 12. 28 13. 29 14. 30 15. 32 16. 33 17. 37 18. 43 19. 47 20. 48 21. 49 22. 50 23. 54 24. 55 25. 58 26. 62 27. 63 28. 70 29. 79 30. 82 31. 87 32. 89 33. 93 34. 96 35. 98 36. 108 37. 112 38. 113 39. 117 40. 119

COURT EXHIBIT # _ I DATE: $\frac{11/25/2621}{\text{TIME:}}$ CASE: USv. MaSuvill SU C&; $320(AJN)$

20cr330, U.S. v. Maxwell Jurors to Proceed to Voir Dire 41. 120 42. 123 43. 124 44. 125 45. 126 46. 129 47. 131 48. 132 49. 147 50. 149 51. 151 52. 152 53. 153 54. 162 55. 164 56. 166 57. 167 58. 169 59. 170 60. 172 61. 174 62. 176 63. 181 64. 182 65. 186 66. 188 67. 189 68. 195 69. 196 70. 198 71. 199 72. 200 73. 204 74. 206 75. 207 76. 216 77. 220 78. 228 79. 235 80. 239

20cr330, U.S. v. Maxwell Jurors to Proceed to Voir Dire 81. 240 82. 241 83. 248 84. 251 85. 260 86. 261 87. 263 88. 270 89. 271 90. 273 91. 275 92. 277 93. 279 94. 280 95. 282 96. 286 97. 290 98. 292 99. 297 100. 299 101.304 102.311 103.312 104.313 105.314 106.315 107.326 108.334 109.340 110.341 111.345 112.347 113.349 114.354 115.363 116.366 117.367 118.372 119.374 120.378

20cr330, U.S. v. Maxwell Jurors to Proceed to Voir Dire 121.379 122.384 123.385 124.387 125.388 126.391 127.394 128.396 129.398 130.403 131.407 132.409 133.411 134.413 135.418 136.419 137.424 138.425 139.426 140.428 141.429 142.430 143.432 144.433 145.434 146.437 147.439 148.440 149.442 150.444 151.445 152.450 153.451 154.452 155.456 156.457 157.459 158.460 159.461 160.465

20cr330, U.S. v. Maxwell Jurors to Proceed to Voir Dire 161.467 162.475 163.477 164.480 165.481 166.485 167.486 168.487 169.489 170.498 171.501 172.504 173.505 174.506 175.509 176.514 177.516 178.517 179.520 180.541 181.543 182.544 183.545 184.549 185.551 186.555 187.556 188.562 189.563 190.565 191.566 192.570 193.573 194.578 195.581 196.582 197.583 198.586 199.589 200.593

20cr330, U.S. v. Maxwell Jurors to Proceed to Voir Dire 201.594 202.595 203.596 204.602 205.604 206.608 207.611 208.612 209.615 210.621 211.622 212.623 213.630 214.637 215.642 216.647 217.651 218.655 219.661 220.667 221.668 222.669 223.670 224.676 225.677 226.680 227.683 228.685 229.690 230.691 231.694

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

United States of America, $-v-$

Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant.

1. Juan Alessi
2. Maria Alessi
3. Carolyn Andriano
4. Janusz Banasiak
6. Daniel Besselsen
10. Michael Buscemi
11. Paul Byrne
12. Tracy Chappell
13. Michael Dawson
14. Dr. Park Dietz
15. Eva Anderson Dubin
16. Glen Dubin

DATE: $\frac{11/16/21}{\text{TIME:}}$ CASE: $\underset{―}{20c·25c}$

20-CR-330 (AJN) Names for Voir Dire

1. Bennett Gershman
2. Lesley Groff
3. Dr. Ryan Hall
4. Annie Farmer
5. Maria Farmer
6. Janice Farmer
7. Jordana Feldman
8. Tony Figueroa
9. Stephen Flatley
10. Dorothy
11. Shawn
12. Nicole Hesse
13. Paul Kane
14. Robert Kelso
15. Sarah Kellen Vickers
16. Elizabeth Nesbitt Kuyrkendall
17. Gerald LaPorte
18. Amanda Lazlo
19. Dr. Elizabeth Loftus
20. John Lopez
21. Nadia Marcinkova
22. Kelly Maguire

1. Pat McHugh
2. Tatum
3. David Mulligan
4. Jennifer Naso
5. Greg Parkinson
6. Joseph Recarey
7. Virginia Roberts Giuffre
8. David Rodgers
9. Alfredo Rodriguez
10. Dr. Lisa Rocchio
11. Adriana Ross Salazar
12. Susan Shelling
13. Timothy Slater
14. Emmy Taylor
15. Melissa
16. Lawrence Visoski
17. Les Wexner
18. Amanda Young

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

United States of America, $-v-$ Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant.

DATE: $\underset{―}{11/16/21}$ TIME: CASE: $\underset{―}{20\times 5\%}$

20-CR-330 (AJN) Locations and Entities for Voir Dire

List of Locations:

A. 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida B. Zorro Ranch, 39 Zorro Ranch Road, Stanley, New Mexico C. 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York D. 116 East 65th Street, New York, New York E. 457 Madison Avenue, New York, New York F. Little St. James Island, U.S. Virgin Islands G. 44 Kinnerton Street, London H. Interlochen Arts Camp, Traverse City, Michigan

List of Entities:

I. Interlochen Arts Camp J. Professional Children's School K. Survivor's Charter School L. West Palm Beach School of the Arts M. Mar-a-Lago

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

United States of America, $-v-$

Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant.

DATE: $11/16/21$ TIME: CASE: $2\mathrm{C}\mathrm{v}\times 730$

20-CR-330 (AJN) Locations and Entities for Voir Dire

Please answer only yes or no (and do not state out loud the name of the program):

Do you have specific familiarity with this television program, other than having heard the name of the program?

We would like the testimony of Jane, Annie and Chotjin.

COURT EXHIBIT # $$ DATE: 12|21|2021 TIME: CASE: USY. MAKING $20\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}320$ (AN)

Hello Luke Nathan We would like to end today at 5 am, deliberate from 4-4-30 tomorrow and have lunch at 12 noon, 4 posside.

Think you

COURT EXHIBIT # $$ DATE: 12/21/2021 TIME: CASE: IT'SY. MAYING SC CR 330 (AJN)

Hello Judee Nutman, On the noneder Ansiis testimony as conspined to commit a. Crime in Court One and Three?

426

COURT EXHIBIT # 9 DATE: $|\underset{―}{\underset{―}{Z}}|\underset{―}{21}\mid \underset{―}{2021}$ TIME: CASE: $\overline{\underset{―}{US}·\underset{―}{MakuKI}}$ $20\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}880(\mathrm{A}\mathrm{J}\mathrm{N})$ .

Hello Jere Nuthu,

Junc Hate

COURT EXHIBIT # 10 DATE: [2/22/21 TIME: $\frac{3:95\mathrm{m}}{20\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}}$ CASE: $\frac{20\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}770}{}$

Good Morning Judge Nathan, May we please have the followings items: Different colored poet-its

• White differ beard
• High lighters (different colored)
• Math's transport

Also, May we have a definition of entitement.

COURT EXHIBIT # 12 DATE: 12/24/2021 TIME: CASE: $\overline{115\mathrm{V}.\text{MAKUZU}}$ 2008320 (AUN)

Hello Judge Nathan, My we phase have the twnscript of David Rogers?

$$12/27/2021$$

COURT EXHIBIT # 14 DATE: 12/27/2021 TIME: CASE: $\overline{\text{TOT MAYONI}}$ $26\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}320$ (AJN)

DATE: $12/24/2021$ TIME: CASE: USY. MAY 12 20 CR 330 (AJN) Hello Judge Nithin. Under Court Four (4), If we defendant aided in the transportation at Jane's return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico whereff the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity, Can she be found guilty under the second element?

Hello Jude Nithan, We would like to end deliberations at 5 am today.

COURT EXHIBIT # 112 DATE: 12|27|2021 TIME: CASE: $\overline{\text{LI5 Y. MAUXI}\mid 1}$ 20 CR 320 (AJN)

Good Mommy Jute, Nattar, My we phare have the COURT EXHIBIT # 13 tolluwing hawarifte: DATE: 12124121 TIME: CASE: 115 r. MAxwII (inswertly tspengata (se) Efizobotry its marie (se) mpanda fowry to san Eithide Mho, may we borge, Obertwatea myodung w schodite, going twovend. Are we mlyuled to nottance deliberations every boy, isotudiny 12/31 and 11/2220 until we reach a verbit? We see is oda to Plan our scodates 0000 - 0 ingly.

Hello Tuke Nithan, We are veyusting the transeupts of the exest Whitress on mervory.

COURT EXHIBIT # 19 DATE: $12|29|21$ TIME: CASE: $\frac{110\mathrm{s}\text{Havesh}}{20\text{CE}380\text{(AJN)}}$

Hello Jake Nathan, May we these have the Lung Vison tramonpt.

Think you.

COURT EXHIBIT # 2C DATE: 12/24|2C2| TIME: CASE: USY. MAYING 20 CR 330 (AJN)

FINAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, -v.-

S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)

GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant.

HONORABLE ALISON J. NATHAN:

VERDICT SHEET ^[1]

Please indicate your verdict with a check mark $(✓)$ . COUNT ONE: Conspiracy to Entice Individuals Under the Age of 17 to Travel in Interstate Commerce with Intent to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity

Guilty $✓$ Not Guilty $$

COUNT TWO: $$ Enticement of an Individual Under the Age of 17 (Jane only) to Travel with Intent to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity

Guilty $$ Not Guilty $\sqrt{}$

COUNT THREE: Conspiracy to Transport Individuals Under the Age of 17 to Travel in Interstate Commerce with Intent to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity

Guilty $✓$ Not Guilty $$

COURT EXHIBIT # $$ 21 $$ DATE: 18/29/2021 TIME: $$ CASE: $\overline{115}\mathrm{V}.\overline{\text{Maxu}}$ $20\mathrm{C}\mathrm{K}330(AJN)$

COUNT FOUR: Transportation of an Individual Under the Age of 17 (Jane only) with Intent to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity

COUNT FIVE: Conspiracy to Commit Sex Trafficking of Individuals Under the Age of 18

Guilty $◻$ Not Guilty $$

COUNT SIX: Sex Trafficking of an Individual Under the Age of 18 (Carolyn only)

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Maxwell

Court Name: District Court, S.D. New York

Date Published: Feb 4, 2022

Docket Number: 1:20-cr-00330

Court Abbreviation: S.D.N.Y.