United States v. Martinez-Vargas

No. 16-41001 Summary Calendar | 5th Cir. | Mar 22, 2017


The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Ines Martinez-Vargas has moved for leave to -withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1967-05-08" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/anders-v-california-107423?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="107423">386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229" court="5th Cir." date_filed="2011-01-31" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/united-states-v-flores-183926?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="183926">632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Vargas has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 6th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.