History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Marsha King
16-7318
| 4th Cir. | Feb 3, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marsha King, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Westley Haynie, Assistant United States Attorney, Joseph Kosky, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Marsha King appeals the district court’s orders denying her “Motion To Stay Restitution Until Release From Incarceration and To Set Schedule Payments for Assessment Fine” and her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. King, No. 2:14-cr- 00065-RAJ-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 6 & Sept. 15, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Marsha King
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 3, 2017
Docket Number: 16-7318
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.