History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Marquis Nelson
669 F. App'x 665
| 4th Cir. | 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marquis Anthony Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. John Lanier File, Assistant United States Attorney, Beckley, West Virginia; Steven Loew, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Marquis Anthony Nelson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. However, we affirm as modified to reflect that Nelson’s motion is dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. See United States v. Modanlo, 762 F.3d 403, 408 (4th Cir. 2014) (holding that “district court does not regain jurisdiction until the issuance of the mandate by the clerk of the court of appeals” (internal quotation marks omitted)). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Marquis Nelson
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 18, 2016
Citation: 669 F. App'x 665
Docket Number: 16-7022
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.