History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Malcolm
282 U.S. 792
SCOTUS
1931
Check Treatment
Pee Curiam.

The first question certified is answered: No. The second question is answered: Yes. Poe v. Seaborn, ante, p. 101; Goodell v. Koch, ante, p. 118; Hopkins v. Bacon, ante, p. 122.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Malcolm
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 19, 1931
Citation: 282 U.S. 792
Docket Number: No. 512
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In