History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Lucas
286 F. App'x 41
4th Cir.
2008
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary Michael Lucas, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Gary Michael Lucas appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lucas, No. 2:05-cr-00055-2 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Lucas
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 11, 2008
Citation: 286 F. App'x 41
Docket Number: 08-6863
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.