History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Liu
2:19-cr-00282
| C.D. Cal. | Sep 19, 2019
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket
Case Information

*1 NICOLA T. HANNA

United States Attorney

BRANDON D. FOX cc: FISCAL Chief, Criminal Division

EDDIE A. JAUREGUI (Cal. Bar No. 297986)

ROGER A. HSIEH (Cal. Bar No. 294195)

Assistant United States Attorneys

Major Frauds Section

1100 United States Courthouse

312 North Spring Street

Los Angeles, California 90012

Telephone: (213) 894-4849/0600

Facsimile: (213) 894-6269

E-mail: eddie.jauregui@usdoj.gov

roger.hsieh@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. CR 19-282-RGK

Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER ISSUING CIVIL CONTEMPT SANCTIONS TO DEFENDANTS v. FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR AT INITIAL APPEARANCE ZHONGTIAN LIU ET AL.,

Defendants.

Having reviewed the government’s Motion for Certification of Facts and Issuance of an Order to Show Cause and the evidence submitted in connection with the Motion (Dkts. 52-53), the Magistrate Court’s Order and Certification of Facts (Dkt. 55), and having presided over the Order to Show Cause Hearing in this matter on September 12, 2019, the COURT HEREBY FINDS: Defendants Perfectus Aluminium Inc., also known as

“Perfectus Aluminum Inc.,” Perfectus Aluminum Acquisitions, LLC, and

1

*2 Scuderia Development, LLC (“defendants”) were properly served under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 4 with summonses to appear before the United States District Court to answer to an Indictment on August 26, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. at the United States Courthouse at 255 E. Temple Street, Los Angeles, California, 90012. The summonses were served on defendants via certified mail to the defendants’ registered agents for service of process, or in the case of Scuderia Development, LLC, to an officer, between August 3, 2019, and August 6, 2019. None of the aforementioned defendants appeared for their

initial appearances at the Roybal Federal Building, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, California, in Courtroom 341, on August 26, 2019, at 2:00 p.m., notwithstanding the summonses to appear in that place and on that date and time. On September 4, 2019, the government filed a motion for

certification of facts and issuance of an order to show cause. (Dkts. 52-53.) On September 9, 2019, the Magistrate Court ordered

defendants to show cause in writing why they should not be adjudged in contempt by 12:00 p.m. on September 11, 2019, and appear before the District Court at 10:00 a.m. on September 12, 2019, for a show cause hearing. (Dkt. 55.) The government served the Magistrate Court’s order (Dkt.

55) to defendants’ registered agent for service of process on September 10, 2019. To date, defendants have failed to state in writing why

they should not be adjudged in contempt, and they failed to appear at the September 12, 2019, show cause hearing.

*3 The government has shown by clear and convincing evidence that defendants have violated a court order by failing to appear for their initial appearances.

Accordingly, the COURT HEREBY ORDERS : Defendants shall each pay a civil contempt sanction of $2000 per calendar day, payable to the Court, until defendants schedule and appear before the Court for arraignment on the The civil contempt sanctions against defendants shall start to accrue two calendars days after the date of entry of this Order. If defendants have not scheduled and appeared before the Court for arraignment on the Indictment four weeks after the civil contempt sanctions ordered herein have begun to accrue, the civil contempt sanctions shall increase to $4000 per calendar day for each defendant. The government may petition the Court for interim judgments

reflecting the accrued sanctions to be due, payable, and subject to immediate collection upon entry of such interim judgments.

///

///

/// *4 The government may petition the Court to increase the daily civil contempt sanction for each defendant if the fine ordered is not sufficiently coercive to obtain defendants’ compliance with their obligations to schedule and appear for their arraignments on the

IT IS SO ORDERED. September 19, 2019 DATE HONORABLE R. GARY KLAUSNER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Presented by:

/s/ ROGER A. HSIEH

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Liu
Court Name: District Court, C.D. California
Date Published: Sep 19, 2019
Docket Number: 2:19-cr-00282
Court Abbreviation: C.D. Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.