History
  • No items yet
midpage
54 F.3d 774
4th Cir.
1995

54 F.3d 774
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Lee R. BALL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-6946.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 24, 1995.
Decided: May 19, 1995.

Lee R. Ball, Appellant Pro Se. Roger William Frydrychowski, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ball, Nos. CR-93-106-R; CA-94-367-R (E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Lee R. Ball
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 19, 1995
Citations: 54 F.3d 774; 1995 WL 309203; 94-6946
Docket Number: 94-6946
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In