History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Kevin Stevens, Jr.
21-7624
| 4th Cir. | Mar 1, 2022
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Stevens, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Stevens, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requesting reconsideration of the court’s order holding Stevens’ 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion in abeyance. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Stevens seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Kevin Stevens, Jr.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 1, 2022
Docket Number: 21-7624
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.