*1 Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Kejuan Chaviz Moore appeals from the revocation of supervised release and 11-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Moore’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have *2 provided Moore the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2 15-50491
[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).