midpage

United States v. Keith CloudyUnited States v. Keith Cloudy

District Court, N.D. Indiana
Sep 1, 2026
2:25-cr-00087

ORDER

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge‘s findings and recommendation upon a plea of guilty issued on August 18, 2026 [DE 72]. Accordingly, the Court now ADOPTS those findings and recommendations, ACCEPTS defendant Candance Marie Rodgers’ plea of guilty, ACCEPTS the plea agreement, and FINDS the defendant guilty of Count 10 of the Superseding Indictment, for violating 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

Any objections a party submits to the probation officer in response to the draft Presentence Report must specifically identify the basis of the objection and any supporting authority. Should the Addendum to the Final Presentence Report reflect any outstanding objections by a party, that party must specifically state in its sentencing memorandum whether it maintains that objection. If so, the party must identify the basis and authority for its objection and, where applicable, any evidence the party expects to offer in support of that objection. The party should also state if, consistent with Rule 32(i)(3)(B), it does not believe a ruling on that objection will be necessary.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: September 1, 2026

/s/Gretchen S. Lund

Judge

United States District Court

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Keith Cloudy
Court Name: District Court, N.D. Indiana
Date Published: Sep 1, 2026
Citation: 2:25-cr-00087
Docket Number: 2:25-cr-00087
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Ind.
Log In