UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan MARTINEZ-SALGADO, also known as Juan Salgado Martinez, also known as Juan Martinez Salgado, also known as Juan S. Martinez, also known as Luciano Escopa, Defendant-Appellant
No. 17-20247
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed February 2, 2018
636
Summary Calendar
Juan Martinez-Salgado, Pro Se
Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Martinez-Salgado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Salgado has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel‘s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel‘s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel‘s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jordan Jericho BAUTISTA-GUNTER, also known as Jordan Jericho Bautista Gunter, also known as Jordan Bautista Gunter, also known as Jordan Bautista, also known as Jordan Gunter, also known as Forrest Gunter, also known as Jordan J. Burghard Gunter, also known as Forrest Jordan Gunter, also known as Jordan J. Burghard, also known as Jordan Forrest Gunter, also known as Jordan Jordan Burghard Gunter, also known as Forrest J. Gunter, also known as Forrest Jordan Burghard Gunter, Defendant-Appellant
No. 17-50084
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed February 2, 2018
637
Summary Calendar
Judy Fulmer Madewell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender‘s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jordan Jericho Bautista-Gunter appeals his guilty plea convictions for possession of a firearm by a prohibited person and carrying a weapon on an aircraft. He argues that the district court erred by denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea because the Government breached its promise, contained in his plea agreement, that it would not oppose his receipt of a
We need not decide whether the Government breached the plea agreement because it cured any breach by making sufficiently clear, both in its amended sentencing memorandum and during Bautista-Gunter‘s sentencing hearing, its intention to remain silent regarding whether Bautista-Gunter should receive the
AFFIRMED.
