United States v. JonesUnited States v. Jones
Lead Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Lead Opinion
ON REHEARING
James Eric Jones petitions for rehearing of his appeal of the district court’s order denying relief on his
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jones, Nos. 4:06-cr-01238-TLW-1; 4:10-cv-70156-TLW (D.S.C. July 22, 2010). Jones also requested to expand the certificate of appealability to consider additional claims. We grant his request, but conclude that his claims are without merit. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.