History
  • No items yet
midpage
348 F.3d 789
9th Cir.
2003

ORDER

The Opinion filed on August 25, 2003 [340 F.3d 1022], is amended as follows:

1) At slip op., p. 11983, paragraph 3, 2d line [340 F.3d at 1027], change “Sutter’s indictment on September 18, 2001” to “Sutter’s arraignment on September 18, 2001.”
2) At slip op., p. 11983, paragraph 3, line 5 [340 F.3d at 1027], change “October 22, 2002” to “October 22, 2001.”
3) At slip op., p. 11992, paragraph 11, line 7 [340 F.3d at 1032], add the words “of the discovery dispute” after “settlement” and before the closing parenthetical.

With these amendments, the panel has unanimously voted to deny appellant’s petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 85.

The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Jonathon Marc Sutter
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 4, 2003
Citations: 348 F.3d 789; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 22637; 2003 Daily Journal DAR 12059; 2003 WL 22479986; 02-50282
Docket Number: 02-50282
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In