*1 Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joey Antrone Carroll, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joey Antrone Carroll appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Carroll’s motion. See United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review), cert. denied , No. 21-5624, 2021 WL 4733616 (U.S. Oct. 12, 2021); see also United States v. High , 997 F.3d 181, 189 (4th Cir. 2021) (affirming district court order denying compassionate release where “[t]he court’s rationale . . . was both rational and legitimate under [18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)]” and “the court sufficiently explained its denial to allow for meaningful appellate review” (internal quotation marks omitted)). We therefore affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Carroll , No. 5:18-cr-00048-KDB-DSC-4 (W.D.N.C. entered July 27, 2020 & filed July 28, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2