History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Joaquin Alvarado
20-10315
| 9th Cir. | Jul 23, 2021
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket
Case Information

*1 Before: SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Joaquin Antonio Alvarado appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 37-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

*2 Alvarado first contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to (1) consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, and (2) explain the sentence adequately, including the court’s reasons for rejecting his request for a downward departure or variance. We review for plain error, see United States v. Valencia- Barragan , 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and conclude that there is none. The district court’s explanation for the sentence, though brief, reflects that the court considered the § 3553(a) factors and Alvarado’s arguments, and concluded that a within-Guidelines sentence was justified by Alvara do’s criminal and immigration history. The court was not required to do more. See United States v. Carty , 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc) (district court is not required to “tick off” the § 3553(a) factors to show that it has considered them and provides an adequate explanation as long as it is sufficient “to permit meani ngful appellate review”) .

Alvarado next contends that the 37-month sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of the district court’s alleged procedural errors and because his particular circumstances justified a downward departure or variance. The court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). In light of the § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, the sentence is substantively reasonable. See Gall , 552 U.S. at 51.

AFFIRMED.

2 20-10315

[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Joaquin Alvarado
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 23, 2021
Docket Number: 20-10315
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.