History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. James Williams
16-11567
| 5th Cir. | May 30, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: [*]

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, James Paris Williams raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Alcantar , 733 F.3d 143, 145- 46 (5th Cir. 2013), and United States v. Trejo , 610 F3d 308, 312-13 (5th Cir. 2010). In Alcantar , we rejected the argument that Nat’l Fed’n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius , 132 S. Ct. 2566 (2012), affected our prior jurisprudence rejecting challenges to the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). 733 F.3d at 146. In *2 Case: 16-11567 Document: 00514011933 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/30/2017

No. 16-11567

Trejo , we applied the plain error standard to a factual sufficiency claim that was raised for the first time in this court. 610 F.3d at 313.

Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative motion for extension of time is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. James Williams
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: May 30, 2017
Docket Number: 16-11567
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.