History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Huff
19 C.M.A. 56
United States Court of Militar...
1969
Check Treatment

Opinion of the Court

PER Curiam:

The accused was convicted by a special court-martial of various acts of misconduct directed against other members of the armed forces. He contends that since the offenses were committed in the civilian community and are cognizable in a civilian court they are not triable by court-martial under O’Callahan v Parker, 395 US 258, 23 L Ed 2d 291, 89 S Ct 1683 (1969).

Assaults and other injuries by one member of the armed forces against another are acts having military significance and are, therefore, not within the constitutional limitation on court-martial jurisdiction expounded in the O’Callahan case. United States v Plamondon, 19 USCMA 22, 41 CMR 22. The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Huff
Court Name: United States Court of Military Appeals
Date Published: Nov 7, 1969
Citation: 19 C.M.A. 56
Docket Number: No. 22,324
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.