History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Horace Taylor
16-6456
| 4th Cir. | Oct 4, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Horace Antonio Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Julius Ness Richardson, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Horace Antonio Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Taylor’s motion for the appointment of counsel, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Taylor, No. 3:13-cr-01036-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Mar. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Horace Taylor
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 4, 2016
Docket Number: 16-6456
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.