History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Hill
1 Cranch 521
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1808
Check Treatment
But THE COURT (DUCKETT, Circuit Judge, absent},

having more fully considered the Acts of Assembly of 1717, c. 13, and 1751, e. 14, § 4, were of opinion that a slave is not a competent witness against a free-born mulatto, not under a state of temporary servitude. It is also clear, that the slave cannot be admitted under the third section of the act of 1717. It cannot be implied, from the exclusion (in the second section) of slaves as witnesses against a white person, that they may be admitted against a free person of color; for the principles of the civil law, and of the laws of every country where slavery is tolerated, exclude, them as witnesses against a free person.

Verdict, “Not guilty.”

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Hill
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
Date Published: Dec 15, 1808
Citation: 1 Cranch 521
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.