History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Hickman
165 F.3d 1020
5th Cir.
1999
Check Treatment

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC AS TO APPELLANTS MARKUS D. CHOPANE AND EDWIN T. LIMBRICK

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the petitions for rehearing en banc filed by Markus D. Cho-pane and Edwin T. Limbrick, and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in *1021favor of granting the rehearings en banc; and, a majority of judges in active service having determined, on the court’s own motion, to rehear the appeals of Masontae Hickman, Jyi R. McCray and Edmond Gasaway en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that these causes shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that under 5th Cir. R. 42.1, the mandate issued in the appeals of Masontae Hickman, Jyi R. McCray and Edmond Gasaway are recalled to prevent injustice.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Hickman
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 20, 1999
Citation: 165 F.3d 1020
Docket Number: No. 97-40237
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.