History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Helen Anderson
698 F. App'x 106
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Helen Jean Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorney, William Jacob Watkins, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Helen Jean Anderson appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Anderson , No. 8:14-cr-00040-HMH-1 (D.S.C. May 22, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Helen Anderson
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 3, 2017
Citation: 698 F. App'x 106
Docket Number: 17-6785
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.