UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANDREW ALEXANDER GUERRERO
CRIMINAL NO. 6:16-97-1; CRIMINAL NO. 6:17-17-1(S)
United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, Victoria Division
June 16, 2020
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
Pending before the Court is Defendant Andrew Alexander Guerrero‘s Emergency Motion for Compassionate Release Reduction in Sentence for Individuals Who Are at Risk of COVID-19 Virus, which he has filed in both of his criminal cases before the Court. 6:16-CR-97-1, D.E. 246; 6:17-CR-17-1(S), D.E. 127.
I. BACKGROUND
In 2017, Defendant pled guilty to conspiracy to transport undocumented aliens in Case No. 6:16-CR-97-1 and to hostage taking in Case No. 6:17-CR-17-1(S). He was sentenced to 120 months’ imprisonment on the alien transporting charge and to 168 months on the hostage taking charge, to run concurrently. Defendant has served roughly 53 months (32%) of his sentence and has a projected release date of February 14, 2029. He now moves the Court for compassionate release because he fears contracting COVID-19 while in prison.
II. LEGAL STANDARD
Defendant moves to modify his sentence pursuant to
(c) Modification of an Imposed Term of Imprisonment.—The court may not modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed except that—
- in any case—
- the court, upon motion of the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, or upon motion of the defendant after the defendant has fully exhausted all administrative rights to
appeal a failure of the Bureau of Prisons to bring a motion on the defendant‘s behalf or the lapse of 30 days from the receipt of such a request by the warden of the defendant‘s facility, whichever is earlier, may reduce the term of imprisonment (and may impose a term of probation or supervised release with or without conditions that does not exceed the unserved portion of the original term of imprisonment), after considering the factors set forth in section 3553(a) to the extent that they are applicable, if it finds that—
- extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant such a reduction . . . and that such a reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission.
The relevant Sentencing Commission policy statement provides that the court may reduce a term of imprisonment and grant release if, “after considering the factors set forth in
(A) Medical Condition of the Defendant.—
- The defendant is suffering from a terminal illness (i.e., a serious and advanced illness with an end of life trajectory). A specific prognosis of life expectancy (i.e., a probability of death within a specific time period) is not required. Examples include metastatic solid-tumor cancer, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), end-stage organ disease, and advanced dementia.
- The defendant is—
- suffering from a serious physical or medical condition,
- suffering from a serious functional or cognitive impairment, or
- experiencing deteriorating physical or mental health because of the aging process, that substantially diminishes the ability of the defendant to provide self-care within the environment of a correctional facility and from which he or she is not expected to recover.
The defendant is (i) at least 65 years old; (ii) is experiencing a serious deterioration in physical or mental health because of the aging process; and (iii) has served at least 10 years or 75 percent of his or her term of imprisonment, whichever is less;
(C) Family Circumstances. –
- The death or incapacitation of the caregiver of the defendant‘s minor child or minor children.
- The incapacitation of the defendant‘s spouse or registered partner when the defendant would be the only available caregiver for the spouse or registered partner.
(D) Other Reasons. –
As determined by the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, there exists in the defendant‘s case an extraordinary or compelling reason other than, or in combination with, the reasons described in subdivisions (A) through (C).
Even if “extraordinary and compelling reasons” for early release exist, the Guidelines’ policy statements provide for a reduction in sentence only if a defendant “is not a danger to the safety of any other person or the community, as provided in
“In general, the defendant has the burden to show circumstances meeting the test for compassionate release.” United States v. Stowe, 2019 WL 4673725, at *2 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 25, 2019).
III. ANALYSIS
Defendant is 29 years old and has served less than one third of his sentence. He claims that he suffers from high blood pressure, a cyst on his left kidney, and a deviated septum, which affects his breathing; however, he has provided no medical records to support his claim that he has been diagnosed with one or more medical conditions that make him particularly vulnerable to severe illness or death should he contract COVID-19.1 Moreover, the BOP has not determined any other extraordinary and compelling reason exists to support Defendant‘s release, nor has it certified that Defendant poses no danger to the community, that he is at no substantial risk of engaging in criminal conduct if released, or that his release to home detention will result in a substantial net reduction of costs to the Federal Government. Finally, the Request for Administrative Remedy that Defendant filed with the Warden of FMC–Fort Worth is dated May 12, 2020—one day before he filed his current motion under
“Courts in the Southern District of Texas have ruled that defendants who move for compassionate release still need to initially petition the BOP and, subsequently, fully exhaust their administrative rights to appeal or wait for 30 days to lapse from such a petition in order to bring a motion pursuant to
Because Movant has failed to wait for 30 days to lapse from the filing of his petition with the warden or otherwise comply with the exhaustion requirements under
IV. CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, Defendant‘s Emergency Motion for Compassionate Release (6:16-CR-97-1, D.E. 246; 6:17-CR-17-1(S), D.E. 127) is DENIED.
It is so ORDERED this 15th day of June, 2020.
JOHN D. RAINEY
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
