History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Gregory
228 F. App'x 303
4th Cir.
2007
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maurice Gregory, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Maurice Gregory appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Gregory, No. 2:92-cr- 00163 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 22, 2006; entered Nov. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Gregory
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 5, 2007
Citation: 228 F. App'x 303
Docket Number: 07-6003
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.