*1 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: [*]
Alejandro Gonzalez-Flores (Gonzalez) appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry. He argues that his Georgia aggravated assault conviction did not constitute a “crime of violence” under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) and that the felony and aggravated felony provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1), (2) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).
*2 No. 05-41165
-2-
Using a “common sense approach,” we hold that the generic,
contemporary meaning of the offense of aggravated assault
includes the intentionally-caused apprehension of injury, 2
W.R. LaFave & A. Scott, Substantive Criminal Law, § 16.3 (2d ed.
2005), and that Gonzalez’s Georgia offense falls within that
generic, contemporary meaning. United States v. Santiesteban-
Hernandez,
Gonzalez’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by
Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
AFFIRMED.
Notes
[*] Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.
